![]() The attorneys are active in the legal and local community and also participate in statewide legal and professional associations and activities. Since 1995, Weinberg & Schwartz has worked diligently to maintain current knowledge of developments and changes in Maryland law. ![]() Additionally, our attorneys are regularly appointed by the court (often at the request of our peers) to serve as Best Interest Attorneys in high-conflict custody cases. As a result, the firm’s attorneys are sought out by the Maryland State Bar Association and other organizations to educate other attorneys in family law practice. Weinberg & Schwartz’s commitment to obtaining a favorable outcome for the client, without losing sight of the best interest of the family, has earned the firm a well-respected reputation throughout the state. The firm works with professionals with expertise in many areas, including accounting, mental health, business valuation and vocational assessments to obtain the optimum results for each client. Our approach is always tailored to the needs of the case you’ll find our attorneys to be effective advocates for your needs in any forum. At the same time, we excel in mediation and collaborative law outside of the courtroom as well. Our lawyers are top-flight litigators with a history of proven results in the courtroom. The attorneys and staff are experienced and knowledgeable in all aspects of Maryland family law. Weinberg & Schwartz, L.L.C., strives to educate its clients regarding their individual rights under Maryland law. For more articles and information, please visit Family & Divorce Lawyer > Firm Overview Firm Overview If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact Mr. Schwartz is presented here to help illustrate how the law works in general, but for specific legal matters, an attorney should be consulted. Cases such as Schwartz may be overruled by subsequent decisions, different judicial departments may have different controlling case law, and the level of the court deciding each case will determine whether it is controlling law or not. ![]() Douglas Barics, attorney at law, for reference only. Schwartz is provided as part of a free educational service by J. Auth., 8 AD3d at 427 Matison v County of Nassau, 290 AD2d at 495). ![]() However, the defendant's failure to provide this Court with the full trial transcript renders the record on appeal inadequate to enable this Court to reach an informed decision on the merits, and thus, the appeal must be dismissed (see Nakyeoung Seoung v Vicuna, 38 AD3d at 735 Gerhardt v New York City Tr. Here, the defendant appeals from the Supreme Court's denial of his motion pursuant to CPLR 4401, made at the close of the plaintiff's case, for judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint. "The record must contain all of the relevant papers that were before the Supreme Court, including the transcript, if any, of the proceedings" (Matison v County of Nassau, 290 AD2d 494, 495 see Matter of Allstate Ins. Auth., 8 AD3d 427, 427 Garnerville Holding Co. "It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal, which must include any relevant transcripts of proceedings before the Supreme Court" (Nakyeoung Seoung v Vicuna, 38 AD3d 734, 735 see CPLR 5525 5526 Gaffney v Gaffney, 29 AD3d 857 Fernald v Vinci, 13 AD3d 333 Gerhardt v New York City Tr. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Concur-Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Lott and Sgroi, JJ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |